What reason’s are humans NOT responsible for global warming?
i need to debate about how humans do not cause global warming.
Tell us when you stopped beating your dog. I know you don’t, but how do you prove something that isn’t? Your question is phrased the same way. How can we prove we are innocent?
As far as I can tell, there is no proof that humans are responsible. Please consider some of the "facts" that used to prove Global Warming, such as Al Gore’s movie "Inconvenient Truth." Did you know In 2007, the UK High Court ruled “Inconvenient Truth” contained “Nine Key Scientific” errors?” The judge ruled it, a "political film" not a science film!. They lied to us.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/3310137/Al-Gores-nine-Inconvenient-Untruths.html
Climategate emails document researchers “hiding data,“”adding temps,”their hate for dissenters. They lied to us & adjusted "data."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100023598/after-climategate-pachaurigate-and-glaciergate-amazongate/
Jan 2010, ICE AGE, "Arctic sea ice increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26%, since 2007!!!!!! WHAT!!!! WHERE HAS THIS DATA BEEN??? The coming Ice Age!! They lied to us!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html
Swiss Scientists say Sunlight melted glaciers, not global warming.
http://www.physorg.com/news180024364.html
RUSSIANS CONFIRM UK scientists MANIPULATED DATA to exaggerate global warming
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100020126/climategate-goes-serial-now-the-russians-confirm-that-uk-climate-scientists-manipulated-data-to-exaggerate-global-warming/
Moving weather stations in China!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/dispute-weather-fraud
Why would people tweak and hide data, and move weather stations around to get higher temperatures? They did it so they could get the higher temperature readings they need to "prove" their theory. Is that science?
The debate is over, Global Warming was a lie. Even the commies agree.
It’s ‘possible’ that Earth’s weakening magnetic field is allowing more solar radiation to reach the Earth. Therefore, that could be the cause of the increase in temperature.
Ask your opponent to prove that it doesn’t.
References :
see my current open question under science and mathematics.
Here’s about 25 of them, and the scientific reasons they’re wrong, so you can be prepared for your opponent’s response.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11462-climate-change-a-guide-for-the-perplexed.html
By the way, I’d avoid the solar radiation one. there’s a ton of clear refutations:
Solar radiation has actually been decreasing (fact).
We’re warming more at night than during the day, the lower atmosphere is warming while the upper atmosphere is cooling, etc. etc. All of which is consistent with CO2 being the cause, and utterly inconsistent with it being the Sun.
One scientist has said, the only problem with putting yet another nail into the coffin of "solar warming" is finding a place to put it.
References :
It’s the sun.
Look up "maunder minimum" and little ice age.
Look up the "medieval warm period"
have fun.
References :
Can’t think of any reasons why humans are NOT responsible…
Next.
References :
Actually no one has ever proven that humans are responsible for affecting our climate, so your job is pretty easy.
CO2 is called a greenhouse gas, but humans only contribute 0.3% of the CO2 in that layer, which is made up of 97% water vapor. So CO2 from humans has a negligible effect on the greenhouse layer, even if it did cause global warming.
We know the planet has been much warmer in the past, so how could CO2 from human activity have caused the warming centuries ago? This just proves it’s a natural occurrence.
Look up all the proof of past warming. We’ve uncovered ancient artifacts buried under ice. Iceland and Greenland had less ice and snow many years ago. They used to be able to grow grapes in northern England according to ancient Roman transcripts.
Read up on the subject and arm yourself with all the facts. The ice core samples show how warming trends came before the increases in CO2. Just the opposite of what the AGW alarmists are saying. In fact, in his movie, Al Gore altered the graphs to get his lies across better.
Actually the whole idea that human activity can cause climate change on this giant planet is preposterous. This is an enormous place that takes care of itself. We have absolutely no effect.
Then you could bring up that fact that the scam has been uncovered showing that these "scientists" who are paid to find AGW actually were hiding data that showed cooling was going on. They have been shown to be concocting a fraud. Now they want that swept under the rug while they demand a "do over" on their AGW theory.
You have tons of resources to go by to put this debate in the bag. I’ll include some links to help, but search for yourself.
Disregard the alarmists on this site. Most of them depend on AGW being believed in order to keep their jobs, so they are slanted on their views. They make their living by keeping the lie alive. They actually lose money when this fraud is uncovered.
Good luck with it. The truth is sometimes hard to get across, but it’s worth it in the end.
References :
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
http://longrangeweather.com/images/GTEMPS.gif
http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2010/02/16/five_wacky_ways_libs_want_to_fight_non-existent_global_warming
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svRUcX9Q9yU
wow i wanted to answer then i saw what i was up against O.O
References :
That it’s something that would happen regardless of human’s lifestyle or not. We just sped it up with our lifestyle and industrial sectors.
References :
http://www.fourgreensteps.com/infozone
Tell us when you stopped beating your dog. I know you don’t, but how do you prove something that isn’t? Your question is phrased the same way. How can we prove we are innocent?
As far as I can tell, there is no proof that humans are responsible. Please consider some of the "facts" that used to prove Global Warming, such as Al Gore’s movie "Inconvenient Truth." Did you know In 2007, the UK High Court ruled “Inconvenient Truth” contained “Nine Key Scientific” errors?” The judge ruled it, a "political film" not a science film!. They lied to us.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/3310137/Al-Gores-nine-Inconvenient-Untruths.html
Climategate emails document researchers “hiding data,“”adding temps,”their hate for dissenters. They lied to us & adjusted "data."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100023598/after-climategate-pachaurigate-and-glaciergate-amazongate/
Jan 2010, ICE AGE, "Arctic sea ice increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26%, since 2007!!!!!! WHAT!!!! WHERE HAS THIS DATA BEEN??? The coming Ice Age!! They lied to us!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html
Swiss Scientists say Sunlight melted glaciers, not global warming.
http://www.physorg.com/news180024364.html
RUSSIANS CONFIRM UK scientists MANIPULATED DATA to exaggerate global warming
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100020126/climategate-goes-serial-now-the-russians-confirm-that-uk-climate-scientists-manipulated-data-to-exaggerate-global-warming/
Moving weather stations in China!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/01/dispute-weather-fraud
Why would people tweak and hide data, and move weather stations around to get higher temperatures? They did it so they could get the higher temperature readings they need to "prove" their theory. Is that science?
The debate is over, Global Warming was a lie. Even the commies agree.
References :
To simply put it dear you’re arguing on the wrong side of history. The emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorocarbons have warmed the earths atmosphere at an increasingly rapid rate. More than any other time in history. As i’ve stated before in other answers to similar questions like this the north and south poles have always been frozen- i mean always for at least the last 5-15 million years. And now there melting –
http://www.enotes.com/earth-science/polar-ice
- the destablization of weather systems evident in the 2010 winter olympics were tons of snow had to be imported inorder for the games to be played. Canada’s 1.2 sq. miles of rain forest dubbed the lungs of the earth are now giving off more carbon dioxide than they’re sucking in.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-canada-trees_wittjan02,0,539661.story
it’s not that climate doesn’t change gradually its that climate doesn’t change rapidly. With in the last decades we have cut back somewhat on greenhouse emissions (although the epa was setback by during the Bush administration) and can compare the effects of it in terms of a smoker who goes from smoking a carton of cigareetes a week to smoking half a carton a cigarettes a week we still haven’t done enough. If the right was so right on this claim that climate change doesn’t exist then why has evey single right wing president since the global warming debate began said they were going to do something about it (Bush Sr., Bush, Mccain) unless their values mean nothing to them, in which in my opinion they don’t have any.
References :
http://www.earthsave.org/globalwarming.htm
Well, the fact that the warming cycles in the past didn’t require any humans should be a good clue.
In fact, our current warming cycle began long before humans industrialized.
References :
Global Warming is not true, All it is, is an advertisement that stupid people who think they are helping a good cause give money to that people stuff into there pockets and do no research at all.
Hears a couple of examples why global warming is not true -
- first off the so called scientist state the fact that the ice caps are melting and show you sad pictures of polar bears dieing. Truth be told that the Not so long ago, the Ice caps were recorded 3 inches thicker than ever recorded on history.
- Evidence show that the 1000 years ago the earth was hotter than it is today
- Nasa has stated that the hottest years of the Century were not the 90’s or 00’s but the 1930’s
- Arctic website Crysophere Today reported that Arctic ice volume was 500,000 sq km greater than this time last year.
- Ten years ago Different Scientists were telling people that it was global freezing, it just did not get as much media coverage.
Truth be told its a big scam for you to fork over your money for them telling you a lie. The Earth goes through out cycles that make it get hot and cold. We Just have to live with it a realize we cant change it.
References :
Dementia, I notice you’ve been copy/pasting the same answer for a heap of different questions. Understandable, since you don’t want to have to write the same thing out a million times. However, that also means it shouldn’t be too hard for you to include sources. What would be even better is if you didn’t use facts that are easily disproved. For example:
"Not so long ago, the Ice caps were recorded 3 inches thicker than ever recorded on history"
This means nothing if you can’t say when. For all I know, not so long ago is a hundred years ago, especially when you start talking about a thousand years ago later in your post.
"Evidence show that the 1000 years ago the earth was hotter than it is today"
Now, this is where not showing your sources becomes really bad, because I can very, very easily find reputable sources that prove you wrong. This could just be something you’ve made up, without sources.
"Nasa has stated that the hottest years of the Century were not the 90’s or 00’s but the 1930’s"
Yeah. IN AMERICA. That doesn’t actually mean a whole lot, especially when the hottest year on record GLOBALLY was 2005. Again, look at my sources.
"Arctic website Cryosphere Today reported that Arctic ice volume was 500,000 sq km greater than this time last year."
I’m finding it hard to get any evidence about this. Again, sources come in handy here. However, since your other points are quite flimsy, I doubt this is anymore correct.
"Ten years ago Different Scientists were telling people that it was global freezing, it just did not get as much media coverage."
Maybe it didn’t get media coverage because it was bad science. Also, ten years ago? In 2000? Scientists had already started picking up on climate change.
The idea that climate scientists are all scamming us for more funding is kind of ridiculous if you think about it for more than a minute. If they’re getting funding for climate change research, then they will have to use that funding for climate change research. They don’t take home the money and buy themselves a yacht, they have to use the money for what they say they will. If climate change in fact doesn’t exist, it makes the whole thing completely redundant.
Now, I’m going to take this and paste it wherever I see your posts.
In answer to the original question, I’m not going to give one because I don’t believe any of the reasons against anthropogenic global warming are especially reliable, so I wouldn’t be particularly helpful.
References :
Earth Hotter Now Than In Past 2,000 Years, Study Says: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/09/080902-hottest-earth.html
1934 Hottest year on Record?: http://www.skepticalscience.com/1934-hottest-year-on-record.htm
Here is a good article against AGW.
http://www.nationscrier.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1:climate-change-natural-or-human-causes&catid=2:current-events
References :
All of them.
References :
First Reason: Solar Radiation.
Bob is wrong – Sunspot activity was high 1980 – 1998, and has been decreasing since then: So has Global Warming. That means Solar activity is a good candidate for explaining the warming, and the subsequent cooling.
Bob is saying Solar radiation can’t be responsible for Global Warming last Century because it is decreasing this Century – that makes no logical sense.
Second Reason: The Earth is vast, Humans are small:
Don’t argue that human activity can not cause Global Warming, just that there is as yet no proof that it does so: CO2 concentration is estimated to have risen from 0.035% to 0.05% during the last 200 years, but is still clearly a minor trace gas at only 500 parts per million. By comparison Nitrogen makes up 78% of the Atmosphere, Oxygen 21%. Of the 1% that is all other gases, CO2 makes up only 5/100ths of that percent. That is pathetic – if 6 Billion humans burning fossil fuels for 200 years can only effect CO2 concentration by a miserable 15 parts per million, no wonder there is no measurable increase in Global temperature outside of speculative computer models. The argument here is that the natural variability in Earth’s climate is so large that any changes made by humanity are so small their effect is negligible.
You will also need to refute the opposing team who willl trot out "evidence" from Al Gore’s Mockumentary: This link should give you some good rebuttal material:
Good luck with your debate!
References :
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html
and if they say the Glaciers are melting, they are not:
http://www.theresilientearth.com/?q=content/himalayan-glaciers-not-melting
Ques:
What reason’s are humans NOT responsible for global warming?
++++
Ans:
No humans around for the previous many thousands of Global Warming (Climate Change) periods! This is not the first or will it be the last Global Warming or Global Cooling change!
Climate changes will occur WITH or WITHOUT humans alive on earth!
References :
Global warming and Cooling is a natural cause so what makes sooo difficult to understand? Corrupt people simply created problems and introduced their own solutions for personal gain and control.
References :
I said it once and I’ll say it again, humans have had very little to do with the climate change or warming or what ever you wish to refer to it as in or around the world. Much like the Sahara desert was once under water and back to the vast wasteland that it is today way before Ford or GM were ever dreamed up! or you and I for that matter? But you will still have people telling you that you’re personally responsible for that as well? Remember this name, "Mother Nature"!
Below is the greatest debate I’ve seen so far! Enjoy…
References :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDv-zgJTLRs
Are you required to prove that we are not responsible for any warming or just the CO2 induced part. We are responsible for Urban Heat Islands, and land change effects, Just imagine the change in temperature from all the blacktop laid in the US from the 1900’s till now.
When it comes to CO2. Ask them to give you research papers which makes a "conclusive" link between CO2 and increased warming. Everybody knows that a room filled with CO2 has more warming than a room of air when a light is shone on both of them. The problem is that the earth is not a room and it is not 100% CO2, there are just too many factors which are unaccounted for, e.g. clouds.
References :
http://meteora.ucsd.edu/~jnorris/presentations/climate_model_clouds.pdf
One cannot be responsible for something nonexistent.
References :