Was it stupid for this Republican debate to have two of the "hot topics" removed from the debate?

They did not include the war or immigration, so was that dumb or not. Also should they have given them more than 30 seconds to answer. Many commentators though it looked like a school class deal.

because it was a short debate and they know that all the candidates will be yapping about immigration and iraq way over time and will run short on time and only get in like 3 questions the whole debate. it’s better to have more questions with shorter answers imo.

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 21st, 2010 at 6:19 pm and is filed under republican debate. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Was it stupid for this Republican debate to have two of the "hot topics" removed from the debate?”

StealthShadow on February 21st, 2010 at 11:47 pm

because it was a short debate and they know that all the candidates will be yapping about immigration and iraq way over time and will run short on time and only get in like 3 questions the whole debate. it’s better to have more questions with shorter answers imo.
References :
dogsrspcl on February 22nd, 2010 at 12:31 am

It was CNN Rinky Dinky. (The way CNN handles repub issues), can’t stand that network.
References :
S P on February 22nd, 2010 at 1:11 am

Yeah that was pretty asinine, especially since it seems every damn debate is avoiding the ‘hot topics’ (Youtube debate). Alan Keyes got on my nerves fast though.
References :
T on February 22nd, 2010 at 1:18 am

there aren’t any topics that are hotter. kind of a waste of air time that way. and 30 seconds it too little time but they all ignore the time limit anyway.
References :

Debate Competition