<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Debate Competition &#187; Al</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sserigaiv.com/tag/al/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Dr. Phil &#8220;N-Word&#8221; Debate: Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/the-dr-phil-n-word-debate-part-4</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/the-dr-phil-n-word-debate-part-4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[how to debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheryl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McGraw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[n-word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/the-dr-phil-n-word-debate-part-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is Part 4 of the Dr. Phil Episode where Dr. Phil, along with Best-Selling Author Hill Harper, Reverend Al Sharpton (VIA Satellite), Conservative radio talk show host Michael Graham and Comedians Cheryl Underwood and Paul Mooney have a very thought-provoking debate on the use of the infamous &#8220;N-Word&#8221;. They discuss EVERYTHING from who uses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/s4xb_bQaTo0/2.jpg" align="left">This is Part 4 of the Dr. Phil Episode where Dr. Phil, along with Best-Selling Author Hill Harper, Reverend Al Sharpton (VIA Satellite), Conservative radio talk show host Michael Graham and Comedians Cheryl Underwood and Paul Mooney have a very thought-provoking debate on the use of the infamous &#8220;N-Word&#8221;. They discuss EVERYTHING from who uses it, to why they use it, to WHO SHOULD or SHOULDN&#8217;T use it, to why it does or doesn&#8217;t offend, and everything in between.</p>
<p>Please feel MORE THAN FREE to express your opinions of the &#8220;N-Word&#8221; and/or this debate in a text or video comment. But ANY NEGATIVE COMMENTS OR RACIST COMMENTS OR COMMENTS THAT USE THE &#8220;ACTUAL N-WORD&#8221; WILL BE DELETED ON THE SPOT SO DON&#8217;T BOTHER! Thank You! <img src='http://www.sserigaiv.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>[DISCLAIMER]THIS VIDEO IS PURELY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY! ALTHOUGH NO USE OF THE &#8220;ACTUAL N-WORD&#8221; WAS USED IN THIS DEBATE, SOME INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE IS EXERCISED! VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED! ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED!</p>
<p>To see more Dr. Phil, including recent Episodes, Blogs, UNCENSORED Behind-The-Scenes looks and much, MUCH MORE, Please Visit:</p>
<p>http://www.DrPhil.com/</p>
<p>Thanks to WorldStarHipHop.com for the video, &#8220;The CNN of Urban Media!&#8221;<br />
(Viewer Discretion is Advised.)</p>
<p>http://www.WorldStarHipHop.com/</p>
<p>Thank You For Watching, And PLEASE KNOW YOUR VOTE! <img src='http://www.sserigaiv.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(END COMMENTS)</p>
<p>I posted this video on YouTube so more people could have access to it. I want it to educate all the ignorant people out there who still use the word. I am a proud African-American man who DOES NOT USE THE N-WORD IN ANY WAY. It&#8217;s NOT CUTE and it&#8217;s NOT FUNNY and it&#8217;s NOT COOL! It&#8217;s VERY UNNECESSARY and I feel that everyone who uses the N-word in any way should at least understand the word, know that it was created to bring down Africans even MORE than they were back in Slavery days, and more importantly, WHY THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES USE IT when it offends so many people. I mean ask yourself, people! Why do you even use the word?</p>
<p>I also happen to own Hill Harper&#8217;s Best-Selling book, &#8220;Letters to a Young Brother&#8221;. It&#8217;s a very good read! <img src='http://www.sserigaiv.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I am ALSO voting for Barack Obama to be the next President of the United States of America. Not because he is African-American, but because I believe in his views of the future. KNOW YOUR VOTE, PEOPLE!</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:7:55</b></p>
<p><span id="more-1134"></span><br />[youtube s4xb_bQaTo0]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/the-dr-phil-n-word-debate-part-4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK leaders clash in second debate</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debates/uk-leaders-clash-in-second-debate</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debates/uk-leaders-clash-in-second-debate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 07:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europenews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/debates/uk-leaders-clash-in-second-debate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The leaders of Britain&#8217;s three main political parties have held a second televised debate, trading heated opinions on foreign policy.
The leaders of the two main parties were again frustrated by Nick Clegg, the challenger from the Liberal Democrats, whose rise in popularity promises to make this election one of the UK&#8217;s closest.
Clegg enjoyed an unexpected [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ROhHaC4ZUwA/2.jpg" align="left">The leaders of Britain&#8217;s three main political parties have held a second televised debate, trading heated opinions on foreign policy.</p>
<p>The leaders of the two main parties were again frustrated by Nick Clegg, the challenger from the Liberal Democrats, whose rise in popularity promises to make this election one of the UK&#8217;s closest.</p>
<p>Clegg enjoyed an unexpected boost following the first debate, propelling his party from third place into first in some polls.</p>
<p>Analysts said that another strong performance from the Liberal Democrat leader would virtually guarantee that the election produces a hung parliament with no clear winner.</p>
<p>Gordon Brown, the Labour prime minister, and David Cameron, the leader of the Conservative party launched stinging attacks on Clegg, with the prime minister at one point telling him to &#8220;get real&#8221; over his plans to reduce spending on nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>Al Jazeera&#8217;s Alan Fisher reports.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:3:4</b></p>
<p><span id="more-1009"></span><br />[youtube ROhHaC4ZUwA]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debates/uk-leaders-clash-in-second-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAFTA: Ross Perot and Al Gore Debate 1993</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debates/nafta-ross-perot-and-al-gore-debate-1993</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debates/nafta-ross-perot-and-al-gore-debate-1993#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nafta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sucking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/debates/nafta-ross-perot-and-al-gore-debate-1993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See the link to the chart for the results of trade with Mexico. The year NAFTA was ratified, America had a $1 billion trade surplus with Mexico. By 1995, America had a $16 billion trade deficit with Mexico. Today, America&#8217;s trade deficit with Mexico is $74 billion. The facts in the chart make President Clinton, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GhwhMXOxHTg/2.jpg" align="left">See the link to the chart for the results of trade with Mexico. The year NAFTA was ratified, America had a $1 billion trade surplus with Mexico. By 1995, America had a $16 billion trade deficit with Mexico. Today, America&#8217;s trade deficit with Mexico is $74 billion. The facts in the chart make President Clinton, Vice President Gore and all the newspaper editors who wrote editorials supporting NAFTA look like complete idiots or worse. Ross Perot was absolutely right even though he was not effective in the debate. Again, no matter what your views are on NAFTA, the chart (link below) speaks for itself. </p>
<p>Also, this video is significant because it documents how NAFTA was sold to America by its elected leaders. In hindsight, some of the most ridiculous statements I heard from the debate was from Vice President Al Gore:</p>
<p>1) &#8220;They [GM] have started to move jobs back from Mexico to the United States.&#8221;<br />
2) &#8220;If he [Ross Perot] is right, then you give six months notice and you&#8217;re out of it [NAFTA].&#8221;</p>
<p>Lessons learned: Any time your government tries to sell you on a free trade deal with another country that has disparate living and environmental standards, don&#8217;t believe it. President Bill Clinton also made similar claims about free trade with Communist China when he signed a free trade agreement with that country in 1999. Today, the US has lost countless jobs to Communist China and suffers a staggering and unsustainable $250 billion annual trade deficit with that country.</p>
<p>Commentary &#8211; Losing Our Independence:<br />
http://barrysacks5.com/losing_our_independence.htm</p>
<p>Chart: 20 Years of Trade With Mexico. Note how the US trade surplus with Mexico turned into large deficits soon after NAFTA was ratified in 1993.</p>
<p>http://barrysacks5.com/us_trade_with_mexico_chart.jpg</p>
<p>Video shared here under &#8220;Fair Use Section 107&#8243; for educational and discussion purposes only.</p>
<p>This is part 1 of 8</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:9:0</b></p>
<p><span id="more-936"></span><br />[youtube GhwhMXOxHTg]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debates/nafta-ross-perot-and-al-gore-debate-1993/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US health debate stalls</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/us-health-debate-stalls</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/us-health-debate-stalls#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlJazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americasanews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/us-health-debate-stalls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A live televised discussion on healthcare reform in Washington was meant to re-energise debate and help politicians find a compromise on the issue. 
But after more than six hours of televised discussions between the president and congressional leaders, there appears to be little movement on reaching a deal.
Al Jazeera&#8217;s Patty Culhane reports from Washington
Duration : [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_Z8Drn-mvPI/2.jpg" align="left">A live televised discussion on healthcare reform in Washington was meant to re-energise debate and help politicians find a compromise on the issue. </p>
<p>But after more than six hours of televised discussions between the president and congressional leaders, there appears to be little movement on reaching a deal.</p>
<p>Al Jazeera&#8217;s Patty Culhane reports from Washington</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:9</b></p>
<p><span id="more-780"></span><br />[youtube _Z8Drn-mvPI]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/us-health-debate-stalls/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Gore Debates Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/al-gore-debates-global-warming</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/al-gore-debates-global-warming#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/al-gore-debates-global-warming</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Gore debates expert climatologists (at last) on whether carbon dioxide causes global warming.
Duration : 0:8:52
[youtube XDI2NVTYRXU]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XDI2NVTYRXU/2.jpg" align="left">Al Gore debates expert climatologists (at last) on whether carbon dioxide causes global warming.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:8:52</b></p>
<p><span id="more-682"></span><br />[youtube XDI2NVTYRXU]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/al-gore-debates-global-warming/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vice Presidential Debate 1992</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/presidential-debate/vice-presidential-debate-1992</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/presidential-debate/vice-presidential-debate-1992#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1992]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quayle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/presidential-debate/vice-presidential-debate-1992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan Quayle, Al Gore, and James Stockdale debate in 1992.
Duration : 0:9:31
[youtube z5Jbmaq4YHA]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z5Jbmaq4YHA/2.jpg" align="left">Dan Quayle, Al Gore, and James Stockdale debate in 1992.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:9:31</b></p>
<p><span id="more-418"></span><br />[youtube z5Jbmaq4YHA]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/presidential-debate/vice-presidential-debate-1992/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US humanism campaign sparks debate &#8211; 02 Nov 09</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/us-humanism-campaign-sparks-debate-02-nov-09</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/us-humanism-campaign-sparks-debate-02-nov-09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlJazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/us-humanism-campaign-sparks-debate-02-nov-09</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent survey in the US showed that more Americans say they do not affiliate themselves with any religion.
Christianity is still dominant in the US, and according to the American Religious Identification Survey, about three-quarters of Americans identify themselves as Christian. 
But one-fifth of Americans say they either have no religion, or are atheist or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PaL8vmIDC7Q/2.jpg" align="left">A recent survey in the US showed that more Americans say they do not affiliate themselves with any religion.</p>
<p>Christianity is still dominant in the US, and according to the American Religious Identification Survey, about three-quarters of Americans identify themselves as Christian. </p>
<p>But one-fifth of Americans say they either have no religion, or are atheist or agnostic, and a new advertising campaign across the country is trying to get more people to pay attention to humanism.</p>
<p>Al Jazeera&#8217;s Kristen Saloomey reports from New York.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:42</b></p>
<p><span id="more-390"></span><br />[youtube PaL8vmIDC7Q]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate/us-humanism-campaign-sparks-debate-02-nov-09/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Doha Debates &#8211; Muslim Women&#8217;s Freedom To Marry &#8211; Yasir Qadhi &amp; Asra Nomani</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate-topics/the-doha-debates-muslim-womens-freedom-to-marry-yasir-qadhi-asra-nomani</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate-topics/the-doha-debates-muslim-womens-freedom-to-marry-yasir-qadhi-asra-nomani#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[debate topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrayed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muhammad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nomani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qadhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thuraya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yasir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate-topics/the-doha-debates-muslim-womens-freedom-to-marry-yasir-qadhi-asra-nomani</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For an insider&#8217;s perspective from Yasir Qadhi, visit:
http://muslimmatters.org/2009/05/26/the-doha-debates-an-insider%E2%80%99s-perspective-yasir-qadhi-asra-nomani-womens-freedom-to-marry/
The Doha Debates session debating the House&#8217;s belief that Muslim women should be free to marry anyone they choose.
For the motion are Asra Nomani from America and Muhammad Habash from Syria. Against the motion are Thuraya Al Arrayed from Saudi Arabia and Yasir Qadhi, American Muslim cleric and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m9CHEhZL0OA/2.jpg" align="left">For an insider&#8217;s perspective from Yasir Qadhi, visit:</p>
<p>http://muslimmatters.org/2009/05/26/the-doha-debates-an-insider%E2%80%99s-perspective-yasir-qadhi-asra-nomani-womens-freedom-to-marry/</p>
<p>The Doha Debates session debating the House&#8217;s belief that Muslim women should be free to marry anyone they choose.</p>
<p>For the motion are Asra Nomani from America and Muhammad Habash from Syria. Against the motion are Thuraya Al Arrayed from Saudi Arabia and Yasir Qadhi, American Muslim cleric and instructor for AlMaghrib Institute.</p>
<p>The debate was the fifth and final of the 2008-2009 year, filmed on May 25th, 2009 in Qatar.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:47:19</b></p>
<p><span id="more-344"></span><br />[youtube m9CHEhZL0OA]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/debate-topics/the-doha-debates-muslim-womens-freedom-to-marry-yasir-qadhi-asra-nomani/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) humbles Hudson Institute dilettante over health care bankruptcies</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/sen-al-franken-d-mn-humbles-hudson-institute-dilettante-over-health-care-bankruptcies</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/sen-al-franken-d-mn-humbles-hudson-institute-dilettante-over-health-care-bankruptcies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[how to debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catastrophic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilettante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firedoglake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/sen-al-franken-d-mn-humbles-hudson-institute-dilettante-over-health-care-bankruptcies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) humbles Hudson Institute dilettante over health care bankruptcies
This during a senate Judiciary sub-committee hearing on bankruptcies driven by catastrophic medical expenses
Visit: http://firedoglake.com
Duration : 0:2:27
[youtube TgqqSHr0wVA]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TgqqSHr0wVA/2.jpg" align="left">Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) humbles Hudson Institute dilettante over health care bankruptcies<br />
This during a senate Judiciary sub-committee hearing on bankruptcies driven by catastrophic medical expenses<br />
Visit: http://firedoglake.com</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:27</b></p>
<p><span id="more-338"></span><br />[youtube TgqqSHr0wVA]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/sen-al-franken-d-mn-humbles-hudson-institute-dilettante-over-health-care-bankruptcies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) humbles Hudson Institute dilettante over health care bankruptcies</title>
		<link>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/sen-al-franken-d-mn-humbles-hudson-institute-dilettante-over-health-care-bankruptcies-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/sen-al-franken-d-mn-humbles-hudson-institute-dilettante-over-health-care-bankruptcies-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[how to debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catastrophic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilettante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firedoglake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/sen-al-franken-d-mn-humbles-hudson-institute-dilettante-over-health-care-bankruptcies-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) humbles Hudson Institute dilettante over health care bankruptcies
This during a senate Judiciary sub-committee hearing on bankruptcies driven by catastrophic medical expenses
Visit: http://firedoglake.com
Duration : 0:2:27
[youtube TgqqSHr0wVA]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TgqqSHr0wVA/2.jpg" align="left">Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) humbles Hudson Institute dilettante over health care bankruptcies<br />
This during a senate Judiciary sub-committee hearing on bankruptcies driven by catastrophic medical expenses<br />
Visit: http://firedoglake.com</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:27</b></p>
<p><span id="more-339"></span><br />[youtube TgqqSHr0wVA]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sserigaiv.com/how-to-debate/sen-al-franken-d-mn-humbles-hudson-institute-dilettante-over-health-care-bankruptcies-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

